From here, We are all hombres-masas, and it fits the question: until point what we are?, IE does up to what extent arrives to us the regulation for damages until magnitude dependent on them? What is more worrying at present, is the man of mass that does not have a personal opinion, therefore, we can ask ourselves: can have an own opinion? Is it that men from other eras, had on average figures, their own opinions in greater degree than men of the present? However, what if it is true, is that the attraction toward a sterile own opinion originality or an opportunism brazen face relations existing., due to the instant supervision of securities orders, just with uneasy change of new projects, guidelines for power, ideologies is stronger in the men of the present. We also cannot forget that today the manifestation means available at the suggestion, find blame in another, endemoniar to each other, because the demonic in one same has been annihilated by rationality. The surplus position is transformed into aggressiveness always ready to the eruption and always accessible to any suggestion. This mode is radically annihilates the feeling of solidarity of the group, leaving aside other social phenomena. In short, the present shows a dynamic of masses that generate serious conflicts and many times have led to very serious situations of instability, especially in the political, that has an impact on the economic.
All of this has generated in the Venezuelan case uncertainty, risks, fears, unproductive, a very turbulent scenario where masses are playing a decisive role in their behavior. US Senator from Vermont addresses the importance of the matter here. You can not forget the fact that the uprisings in Russia, Hungary and Germany gave rise to a resurgence of the action and the initiative of the masses. Social needs compelieron to the action of the masses. But the traditions for example, of the old labor movement in Western Europe and the economic backwardness of Eastern Europe foiled the compliance with the working historic mission. Western Europe saw the defeated masses and the rise of fascism with Benito Mussolini and Hitler, while the backward economy of Russia developed a communism in which the distinction between class and Vanguard, role specialisation and the regimentation of the work reached its highest strength.
In Venezuela the role of the masses is very relevant today, especially against the effects, proposals of the Bolivarian revolution has given way to a new paradigm or a different way of observing the social movements, with respect to the changes that have occurred, to conflict between groups who oppose socialism and those who support it. Faced with this reality points out noticiasdelsur.com, that if we GCT traditionally social movements today in Venezuela, we could conclude, with few exceptions, which are characterised by a purposeful organizational weakness, some dispersion and disarticulation, lack of visibility, without a clear fight platform, suffering of the self-censorship, lack of political initiative, levels of institutionalization of some and more in an almost vertical alignment with the policies of the Estado.Pero possibly the Bolivarian revolution also us is proposing a new era for social movements, giving them a leading role in public policies and in the configuration of a new model of State. At the same time that, at the international level, the Venezuelan Government develops relationships fluid with almost all social movements of Latin America and the rest of the world, results of unpublished spaces such as the Advisory Council of the social movements of ALBA (Bolivarian alternative for the Americas).