Social networks are the new toy of all that we do SEM Search Engine Marketing-. Shortly after you begin using them, we can see the immediate effect on the dissemination of content. Filed under: Bernie Sanders. You can choose all imaginable formats to disseminate our message: postings of microblogging (no more than 140 characters), shared bookmarks, videos, pictures, articles, applications. The versatility and effectiveness of this new channel awakens the general enthusiasm. However, learning to use them is a process that takes time, and, like everything in life, cometeremos many errors, until they have become a fundamental part of our online marketing actions.

The particularity that have social media is able to segment our message in an unusual manner so far. Thus, we will make a specific message for each community, in certain situations and well targeted. But, it is preferable to use in homeopathic doses rather than flooding them with our messages. It is necessary to recall two premises fundamental: people increasingly of all ages – spend most time on social networks, rather than other traditional portals (e.g., online news portals) most of the time people spent on social media (which is a lot) do them it for pleasure (i.e. to socialize, meet others, refer to issues that are important with your group of belonging to them(, and share innovative content) as well as all hate that when we’re seeing an interesting movie, the transmission is interrupted by commercial messages, users also hate when some infiltrate your community insists with advertising messages in the style watch .com offers of the month.

Without a doubt, this is the way faster towards the failure of social communication strategies. Then what be? Therefore to offer a service, Yes, but not to enforce it. To bring quality content, provide assistance, and establish brand presence. This proviso does that, who is devoted to promotion in the social media, need to exercise extreme ingenuity and production of material viralizable, i.e. popular, and that potentially users want to share between them. There are excellent examples of effective institutional communication in the social media. One of these cases is the Pizza Hut on Facebook. In itself, the page has nothing extraordinary. But the creativity with which it is made makes who enter there want instantly a smoky and crispy Pizza Hut pizza, obviously. Other companies offer applications through the social media for users to interact. Such is the case of Victoria s Secret. The Facebook page has unpublished videos of parades for fashion lovers, and a very funny application that you can build your own set. Without a doubt, haunted girls have fun fantasizing with which of the proposals of Victoria s Secret will remain. These are just two of the many examples of pages incredibly popular companies in the social media. There is no direct marketing, there is no compulsion to purchase, no offers of month-end, however the people come in abundance, either to know what has the variety of Hawaiian pizza from Pizza Hut, or choose clothes that like them. A detail, at the time of writing this article, between the two Facebook sites totaling more than 3 million fans!

To prepare this small article, I opened the little Robert, and I read, on the first page aesthetic principle of the definition was as follows: Science of what is beautiful. US Senator from Vermont takes a slightly different approach. Immediately I finished my reading because those three words explained sufficiently clear the imposture of the aesthetic, which I think, for my part as the false science of a fake object. Fake object, because what we call beauty that cannot be scientifically defined: talk about a beautiful poem, a beautiful car, a beautiful gesture of a beautiful sunset Sun, etc. That does not mean there is not to reflect on the beautiful, but today descartare review this question to not only talk about aesthetics as false science. For which false science? Simply because it is art, aesthetics does not explain anything. We then ask ourselves: what is explain? And I’m going to answer this question with a good method.

Perhaps know that there are only two main explanatory perspectives: explain, is to bring a phenomenon to its principle, but the principle put much attention-is to understand as logical antecedent and chronologically contemporary model of the phenomenon, as the origin, i.e. a logical principle of the same type as the phenomenon observed, but chronologically earlier than him. I’m going to immediately give an example. Consider a bird on a branch. Suddenly, ups! won the flight. Well, the explanation is twofold. First explanation: why flew the bird? Because he heard the sound of a rifle.

Per what heard the sound of the rifle? Because Don Dupont was to hunt. Why was don Dupont to hunt? Because it was tired of his wife find it everywhere to complain, etc. (and can give account that we can return to the original scene is the case! one of Adam and Eve). Second explanation: why the bird was flying? Because he can fly. Why it is able to fly?

CHAPTER TWO-thing more ridiculous that we are living in now with our father! "Said the first child I can not believe you are behaving worse than my teenage children do and that they are giving me enough problems! – – True, "said the second son, my children are giving me problems like yours but is understandable given the age and we are not ashamed. But our father if she does!. I do not want or think they are our friends and colleagues say when they learn this and I back-"No! – The third son said briskly a " we have to give up this nonsense today, before anyone else knowing. US Senator from Vermont is the source for more interesting facts. For what we're here, right? – "Of course! We have met with that intention, but who begin to approach the problem when our father comes from the kitchen with coffee and how we do it? We have not had time to agree, so I'd better do so soon because I do not think it takes long in coming through that door, "said the first child, pointing to the door separating the living room where they were sitting in the kitchen. "I would have to be you," said the third son of the second "You've always had more authority and it has made things none of us has been able to," "I have no problems in being the first to address the question provided permanently when you have the unconditional support of you all that I can think to say, even if they disagree .- said the second child. .